feat: update gitea vendor

package/gitea/source/models/issues/review.go

@@ -10,16 +10,16 @@ import (
 	"slices"
 	"strings"
 
-	"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
-	git_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/git"
-	"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/organization"
-	"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/perm"
-	access_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/perm/access"
-	"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unit"
-	user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
-	"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/structs"
-	"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/timeutil"
-	"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/util"
+	"gitea.dev/models/db"
+	git_model "gitea.dev/models/git"
+	"gitea.dev/models/organization"
+	"gitea.dev/models/perm"
+	access_model "gitea.dev/models/perm/access"
+	"gitea.dev/models/unit"
+	user_model "gitea.dev/models/user"
+	"gitea.dev/modules/structs"
+	"gitea.dev/modules/timeutil"
+	"gitea.dev/modules/util"
 
 	"xorm.io/builder"
 )
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ func (err ErrNotValidReviewRequest) Unwrap() error {
 	return util.ErrInvalidArgument
 }
 
-// ErrReviewRequestOnClosedPR represents an error when an user tries to request a re-review on a closed or merged PR.
+// ErrReviewRequestOnClosedPR represents an error when a user tries to request a re-review on a closed or merged PR.
 type ErrReviewRequestOnClosedPR struct{}
 
 // IsErrReviewRequestOnClosedPR checks if an error is an ErrReviewRequestOnClosedPR.
@@ -324,6 +324,59 @@ func IsOfficialReviewerTeam(ctx context.Context, issue *Issue, team *organizatio
 	return slices.Contains(pb.ApprovalsWhitelistTeamIDs, team.ID), nil
 }
 
+// RecalculateReviewsOfficial re-evaluates the "official" flag of the latest approve
+// and reject reviews of an issue against its pull request's current base branch.
+// It must be called whenever the target branch changes, otherwise an approval that
+// was official on the previous (possibly unprotected) branch would keep satisfying
+// the new branch's protection rules.
+func RecalculateReviewsOfficial(ctx context.Context, issue *Issue) error {
+	if err := issue.LoadPullRequest(ctx); err != nil {
+		return err
+	}
+
+	// Clearing and restoring the official flags must happen atomically, otherwise a
+	// failure in between would leave the reviews without any official flag set.
+	return db.WithTx(ctx, func(ctx context.Context) error {
+		// Only the latest approve/reject review of each reviewer counts as official, so
+		// clear the flag on all of them first and restore it only where it still applies.
+		if _, err := db.GetEngine(ctx).
+			Where("issue_id = ?", issue.ID).
+			In("type", ReviewTypeApprove, ReviewTypeReject).
+			Cols("official").
+			Update(&Review{Official: false}); err != nil {
+			return err
+		}
+
+		reviews, err := FindLatestReviews(ctx, FindReviewOptions{
+			Types:   []ReviewType{ReviewTypeApprove, ReviewTypeReject},
+			IssueID: issue.ID,
+		})
+		if err != nil {
+			return err
+		}
+
+		for _, review := range reviews {
+			if err := review.LoadReviewer(ctx); err != nil {
+				return err
+			}
+			if review.Reviewer == nil {
+				continue
+			}
+			official, err := IsOfficialReviewer(ctx, issue, review.Reviewer)
+			if err != nil {
+				return err
+			}
+			if official {
+				if _, err := db.GetEngine(ctx).ID(review.ID).Cols("official").Update(&Review{Official: true}); err != nil {
+					return err
+				}
+			}
+		}
+
+		return nil
+	})
+}
+
 // CreateReview creates a new review based on opts
 func CreateReview(ctx context.Context, opts CreateReviewOptions) (*Review, error) {
 	return db.WithTx2(ctx, func(ctx context.Context) (*Review, error) {
@@ -483,6 +536,14 @@ func SubmitReview(ctx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, issue *Issue, revi
 		if _, err := sess.ID(review.ID).Cols("content, type, official, commit_id, stale").Update(review); err != nil {
 			return nil, nil, err
 		}
+
+		// make sure the leftover review request is cleared, consistent with CreateReview
+		if reviewType != ReviewTypePending {
+			if _, err := sess.Where(builder.Eq{"reviewer_id": doer.ID, "issue_id": issue.ID, "type": ReviewTypeRequest}).
+				Delete(new(Review)); err != nil {
+				return nil, nil, err
+			}
+		}
 	}
 
 	comm, err := CreateComment(ctx, &CreateCommentOptions{
@@ -900,8 +961,8 @@ func MarkConversation(ctx context.Context, comment *Comment, doer *user_model.Us
 // CanMarkConversation  Add or remove Conversation mark for a code comment permission check
 // the PR writer , official reviewer and poster can do it
 func CanMarkConversation(ctx context.Context, issue *Issue, doer *user_model.User) (permResult bool, err error) {
-	if doer == nil || issue == nil {
-		return false, errors.New("issue or doer is nil")
+	if doer == nil {
+		return false, nil
 	}
 
 	if err = issue.LoadRepo(ctx); err != nil {
@@ -1004,19 +1065,23 @@ func (r *Review) GetCodeCommentsCount(ctx context.Context) int {
 	return int(count)
 }
 
-// HTMLURL formats a URL-string to the related review issue-comment
+// HashTag returns unique hash tag for review.
+func (r *Review) HashTag() string {
+	return fmt.Sprintf("pullrequestreview-%d", r.ID)
+}
+
+// HTMLURL formats a URL-string to the review on the pull request page
 func (r *Review) HTMLURL(ctx context.Context) string {
-	opts := FindCommentsOptions{
-		Type:     CommentTypeReview,
-		IssueID:  r.IssueID,
-		ReviewID: r.ID,
+	if r.Type != ReviewTypeApprove && r.Type != ReviewTypeComment && r.Type != ReviewTypeReject {
+		return "" // only submitted reviews get a timeline block carrying the anchor
 	}
-	comment := new(Comment)
-	has, err := db.GetEngine(ctx).Where(opts.ToConds()).Get(comment)
-	if err != nil || !has {
+	if err := r.LoadIssue(ctx); err != nil {
 		return ""
 	}
-	return comment.HTMLURL(ctx)
+	if err := r.Issue.LoadRepo(ctx); err != nil {
+		return ""
+	}
+	return r.Issue.HTMLURL(ctx) + "#" + r.HashTag()
 }
 
 // RemapExternalUser ExternalUserRemappable interface